ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine
Practice Pattern of Critical Care UltraSonography in India (POCUS India): A Multicenter Cross-sectional Survey.
Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on: Practice Pattern of Critical Care Ultrasonography in India [Point-of-care Ultrasound (POCUS) India]: A Multicenter Cross-sectional Survey.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- Author Response: Comment on-Practice Pattern of Critical Care Ultrasonography in India (POCUS India)/A Multicenter Cross-sectional Survey.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Performing a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) scan in critical care, along with the incorporation of the findings into a clinical pathway, has now become the standard of care. The Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) has established an ultrasound network and released the desirable competencies for intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians regarding the same. This survey was performed to study the practice patterns and barriers to utilizing POCUS among various specialists across Indian ICUs. Methods: An online survey-based, cross-sectional, multicenter, observational study was conducted over a period of 3 months with a questionnaire based on the utility, skills, training, and comfort in performing POCUS in Indian ICUs. Results: A total of 864 responses were received and analyzed. A total of 67.4% among them were specialists in critical care medicine, and 67.2% had received some form of training in POCUS. Most clinicians reported using POCUS for lung assessments, volume status evaluation, and focused cardiac assessments. Key barriers were inadequate training, limited machines, lack of supervision, time constraints, and medicolegal issues, though 32.4% reported no major obstacles. The majority of participants agreed that POCUS enables more efficient and safer care for critically ill patients. 624/864 respondents strongly agreed that POCUS training is essential for intensivists. Conclusion: Point-of-care ultrasound is being increasingly adopted across various specialties in critical care settings. This survey highlights the practice pattern of POCUS across India and possible limitations in expanding the role of POCUS for the management of critically ill. CTRI reg: CTRI/2022/09/045417. How to cite this article: Pal D, Govil D, Pachisia AV, Soni KD, Gupta S, Kothekar AT,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.