ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2026
Transformer-based deep learning for estimating bidirectional maternal-fetal cardiac coupling.
Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Maternal-fetal cardiac coupling has emerged as a promising non-invasive marker of fetal autonomic regulation and neurocardiac development. However, existing approaches are limited by unidirectional modeling, handcrafted coupling metrics, and a lack of interpretable and clinically validated abnormality assessment frameworks. Methods: We propose a transformer-based deep learning framework for bidirectional maternal-fetal cardiac coupling analysis using heart rate variability (HRV) features. The model learns fetal-to-maternal (FTM) and maternal-to-fetal (MTF) interactions using two independently trained UNETR-based models with identical architecture and no shared weights. The framework is evaluated on a real clinical dataset, incorporating time-delay, gestational, and classification analyses. Results: Time-delay analysis revealed directional asymmetry, with MTF coupling peaking at 3 seconds and FTM at 5 seconds. Gestational analysis showed relatively stable MTF coupling, while FTM coupling was consistently reduced in abnormal cases. Classification using support vector machines demonstrated strong discrimination, with the full-feature model (MTF + FTM + gestational week) achieving ROC-AUC = 0.91 ± 0.08. Under class imbalance, the coupling-only model (MTF + FTM) achieved the highest PR-AUC, indicating robust minority-class sensitivity. Discussion: These findings suggest that bidirectional coupling analysis may provide useful insight into maternal-fetal physiological interactions. However, the results should be interpreted as proof-of-concept evidence due to the limited and heterogeneous abnormal cohort. Further validation on larger and more homogeneous datasets is required to assess the potential of this approach for non-invasive prenatal monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.