ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Evaluating the real-world robustness of face-swap detection models under compression and noise.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Recent advances in generative adversarial networks (GANs) and autoencoding techniques have significantly improved the realism of face-swap and deepfake media, creating substantial challenges for digital media authentication. Although existing deepfake detection models achieve high accuracy on benchmark datasets, their robustness under real-world media degradations remains insufficiently explored. Methods: This study systematically evaluates the resilience of five leading face-swap detection models-XceptionNet, MesoNet, FSD-GAN, FakeTracer, and a Hybrid + Landmark approach-under four common distortions: JPEG compression (quality levels 20-90), Gaussian noise ( Results: The results demonstrate a substantial reduction in detection performance under degraded conditions. Average accuracy declined from 94.7% on clean data to 67.8% on distorted data, corresponding to an overall degradation rate of -26.9%. JPEG compression and motion blur caused the most significant performance drops, with reductions of up to 35%, particularly for lightweight CNN-based detectors. In contrast, FSD-GAN and FakeTracer exhibited greater robustness, maintaining degradation rates of no more than -15% due to their latent fingerprinting and trace embedding mechanisms. Discussion: The findings highlight the limitations of current deepfake detection systems when deployed in real-world environments where media distortions are prevalent. The study emphasizes the need for distortion-aware training strategies, cross-condition benchmarking, and deployment-oriented evaluation protocols. Furthermore, a dual-branch framework integrating a Vision Transformer (ViT) for spatial artefact detection with a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) or Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) for temporal coherence modelling is proposed as a promising direction for improving the robustness and reliability of future deepfake detection systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.