ArticleFood science & nutrition2026
Biocomposite Films Reinforced With Nano Navy Bean Starch: Application and Characterization.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, enzymatically ultrasonicated starch biocomposite film (E-USCF) was produced by reinforcing enzymatically ultrasonicated starch nanoparticles (E-US) with native navy bean starch (NS) in different concentrations (0.5%, 1%, 2%, 5%, and 10%). After that, they were characterized in terms of physicochemical, mechanical, and thermal properties and compared to native starch biocomposite films (NSCF). The E-USCF samples showed high solubility, pH, breaking strength, and thickness by increasing the concentration of E-US samples while reducing the water vapor transmission rate (WVTR), moisture content, swelling characteristics, and transparency. Moreover, the biodegradability rate reached 87% within 8 days by elevation of E-US up to 10%. As a consequence, thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) confirmed the same results, as E-USCF 10% had an ash residual of 19.88% compared to the NSCF sample at 23.95%. Furthermore, lowering tensile stress and strain of biocomposite film analyses were confirmed by the elevation of incorporation of E-US up to 10%. In summary, E-US particles acted as a structural reinforcing agent and improved E-USCF's properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.