ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Impact of closed-system suctioning on self-reported dyspnea in mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective observational study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endotracheal suctioning is an essential airway care procedure in mechanically ventilated patients, yet its acute impact on subjective respiratory distress has not been systematically quantified. Methods: In this prospective self-controlled observational study conducted from May to October 2025 in a tertiary intensive care unit (ICU) in Sichuan Province, China, awake mechanically ventilated adults with a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of 0 to +1 requiring closed-system suctioning were enrolled. Dyspnea intensity was assessed using the Dyspnea Visual Analog Scale (D-VAS, 0-10) before suctioning (T0), immediately after suctioning (T1), and 5 min post-suctioning (T2). Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO Results: Fifty-three suctioning procedures from 42 patients were included. D-VAS scores increased significantly from 2.8 ± 1.9 at T0 to 6.4 ± 2.1 at T1 (mean increase 3.6, 95% CI: 3.1-4.1, Conclusion: These findings suggest that closed-system suctioning may induce clinically significant but transient worsening of dyspnea that appears independent of oxygenation status. Individual dyspnea assessment during routine suctioning care warrants attention, and confirmatory multicenter studies with prospective power calculations are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.