Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42415758›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026

From awareness to action: determinants of zoonotic risk perception and protective practices among farm and livestock workers.

Yong Shen Ooi, Norefrina Shafinaz Md Nor, Nur Azalina Suzianti Feisal, Wai Yan Cheah

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yong Shen OoiCentre of Research in Development, Social and Environment (SEEDS), Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Norefrina Shafinaz Md NorDepartment of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Nur Azalina Suzianti FeisalMSU Center for Climate Resilience and Strategy (m-CREST), Management and Science University (MSU), University Drive, Off Persiaran Olahraga Section 13, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
Wai Yan CheahCentre of Research in Development, Social and Environment (SEEDS), Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Zoonotic disease prevention among farm and livestock workers depends not only on awareness, but also on how workers perceive occupational risk and the feasibility of protective action. This systematic literature review examined how farm and livestock workers perceive zoonotic disease risks and how these perceptions relate to everyday practices and working environments. Methods: The review followed PRISMA guidance and used a PICO-based question formulation. Searches were conducted in Web of Science and Scopus. A total of 28 studies were included, covering dairy, pig, poultry, and mixed livestock systems across Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas. Evidence was synthesized thematically, with attention to risk perception, knowledge gaps, protective practices, and socio-environmental determinants. Results: Workers generally recognized that animals can transmit disease to humans, but their understanding of specific pathogens, transmission routes, high-risk tasks, and preventive measures was uneven. Knowledge gaps were most evident for endemic, environmentally mediated, and parasitic infections. A persistent perception-behavior gap was observed, particularly where personal protective equipment, sanitation, clean water, supervision, and institutional support were limited. Discussion: Protective practices were shaped by socio-cultural norms, gendered labor roles, livelihood pressures, environmental conditions, workplace safety climate, and employer or institutional support. The findings highlight the need for multi-level One Health strategies that combine worker-centered education with improvements in infrastructure, regulation, organizational safety culture, and cross-sector collaboration. The review also identifies the need for future research in under-studied agricultural settings, including plantation contexts.

Indexed as

FarmersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeLivestockZoonosesAnimalsHumansOccupational ExposureWorking Conditionsagricultural workersenvironmental managementoccupational exposureone healthrisk perceptionzoonotic diseases

Identifiers

PMID42415758
PMCPMC13340411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.