ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Contemplative practices for healing historical trauma among BIPOC populations: a scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Contemplative practices encompass a range of mental and physical exercises that cultivate awareness, steadiness, and compassion. While contemplative practices have been shown to treat trauma, their application toward historical trauma is limited. To address this gap, our scoping review aims to answer the following research questions: (1) What contemplative practices have been applied toward individual and collective healing of historical trauma, (2) what are the mechanisms by which contemplative practices can facilitate healing historical trauma, and (3) what research methods are used to develop, evaluate, and adapt contemplative practices for healing historical trauma? Methods: Rigorous search protocol were established to find English-language articles published after 1998 that were intervention studies incorporating contemplative practices to treat historical trauma or an outcome connected to historical trauma theory. Of 645 identified articles, 35 met eligibility criteria. Covidence software was used to extract general study information, sample characteristics, intervention details, and contemplative components. Thematic analysis was performed to identify mechanisms of healing across all articles. Results: Results showed a rising rate of publications within the last decade. Most articles were qualitative or mixed methods, applied community-engaged methods, and included Indigenous populations. Most interventions took place at a community (53%) or group level (36%), and more than half (58%) used contemplative practices as a core component. The most common practices were creative (56%), relational (53%), ritual (47%), and stillness (42%). Thematic analysis identified seven healing mechanisms: (1) Establishing Safety and Belonging, (2) Revitalizing Culture, (3) Increasing Well-being, (4) Processing Emotion, (5) Raising Consciousness, (6) Changing Narratives, and (7) Growing Empowerment. Discussion: This study provides a foundation to understand healing mechanisms within specific branches of contemplative practice in relation to historical trauma. Many culturally grounded contemplative practices support Indigenous well-being and should be recognized more explicitly in the contemplative science literature as effective, evidence-based approaches for improving public health in communities impacted by historical trauma. The fields of contemplative practice and historical trauma can be advanced by bridging Indigenous studies and BIPOC community practice with contemplative science, so long as this work continues to be carried out in deep partnership with and for BIPOC communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.