ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Caregiver decision-making on pediatric research participation in congenital heart disease in western China: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: High-quality pediatric clinical research depends on effective and ethically robust recruitment, yet participation can be difficult for families of children with congenital heart disease (CHD), particularly in resource-constrained and culturally diverse settings. In western China, long-distance care-seeking, financial strain, family-centered decision-making, and evolving pediatric research protections may shape how caregivers understand and negotiate research participation. Methods: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study at a tertiary pediatric referral center in western China between June and December 2025. Caregivers of children with CHD participated in one-to-one semi-structured interviews. Interviews explored practical burden, perceptions of research and treatment, therapeutic misconception, trust, child assent, and strategies to improve recruitment. Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim, anonymized, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Thematic saturation was reached after 22 interviews. Four overarching themes were identified: (1) families' real-world constraints and the costs of research participation; (2) cognitive biases and tensions surrounding therapeutic misconception; (3) trust anchors and views on assent, insurance, and institutional protection under a changing policy context; and (4) strategies for optimizing recruitment. Caregivers commonly weighed research participation against treatment-related burdens, especially travel distance, accommodation costs, wage loss, and repeated hospital visits. Decisions were further shaped by collective family decision-making, culturally mediated concerns about bodily integrity, confusion between research and individualized treatment, and strong reliance on physician recommendation. Participation was generally more acceptable when procedures were non-invasive or integrated into routine care, whereas extra venipuncture was often resisted. Caregivers also emphasized the value of plain-language, visual, dialect-adapted, and child-friendly communication. Conclusions: Caregivers' decisions about pediatric clinical research participation in western China are shaped by structural disadvantage, family-centered norms, therapeutic misconception, and trust in physicians and institutions. Recruitment should reduce burden, improve comprehension, support family communication, and accommodate children's developing role in research decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.