ArticleInternational neurourology journal2026
Wearable Ultrasound Devices for Continuous Bladder Monitoring: Emerging Utility and Current Limitations in Neurourology.
Article in International neurourology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Urodynamic Study Revisited: An Evolving Tool in Functional Urology.International neurourology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring bladder filling is crucial in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, particularly for safe and timely clean intermittent catheterization. Wearable ultrasound devices have recently gained attention as potential aids for continuous bladder monitoring, but they differ fundamentally from traditional bladder scanners. While portable scanners directly measure postvoid residual volume in milliliters, first-generation wearable devices using amplitude mode (A-mode) ultrasound primarily monitor bladder fullness trends and provide threshold-based alerts rather than precise quantitative volume measurements. This narrative review examines wearable ultrasound technologies in neurourology, searching PubMed, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar for relevant clinical studies. Most available data come from small observational studies in pediatric populations. In children with functional voiding dysfunction (FVD), devices such as SENS-U achieved sensitivities of 85%-90% for detecting bladder fullness thresholds with good correlation to urodynamic measurements. However, performance in neurogenic bladder populations is concerning: a recent study in children with neurogenic bladder reported only 46% accuracy and 13% specificity using DFree, indicating unacceptably high false-positive rates. No prospective validation studies have been conducted in adults with spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, or those at risk for autonomic dysreflexia. Regulatory classifications vary significantly among devices: SENS-U holds Conformité Européenne marking as a Class IIa medical device for pediatric use, while DFree is marketed as a consumer wellness product without medical device approval. EdgeFlow UW20, which employs a deep learning-based automatic bladder contour detection, recently received Ministry of Food and Drug Safety approval in Korea as a digital medical device. Currently, evidence supports considering wearable bladder monitors only for pediatric FVD under medical supervision. For neurogenic bladder populations, these devices are not recommended for routine clinical use until population-specific validation studies demonstrate adequate diagnostic accuracy. The emergence of B-mode (brightness mode) deep learning-based devices may address the fundamental limitations of first-generation A-mode technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.