Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42415540›Full record

Observational studyAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026

Cannabis use, affect and emotion regulation in daily life: A 3-week experience sampling method study in people who smoke cannabis almost daily.

Ana Paula Gonçalves Donate, Janna Cousijn, Emese Kroon, Kristine Rømer Thomsen

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana Paula Gonçalves DonateCentre for Alcohol and Drug Research, Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3048-3042
Janna CousijnNeuroscience of Addiction Lab, Center for Substance Use and Addiction Research, Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2582
Emese KroonCentre for Alcohol and Drug Research, Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1803-9336
Kristine Rømer ThomsenCentre for Alcohol and Drug Research, Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3612-5529

Funding

School of Business and Social Sciences (BSS) at Aarhus University (AU) funded this research as a PhD scholarship for APGD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAlthough many people who use cannabis report mood-enhancing effects, affective responses are thought to vary within and between individuals. This study examined the bidirectional associations between momentary affect and cannabis use and the potential moderating role of emotion regulation in this.

designIntensive longitudinal observational study using experience sampling method (ESM).

settingDenmark.

participantsAdults in Denmark who use cannabis near daily (n = 113; Age: mean = 31.57 years, median = 29 years, standard deviation = 10.28, inter-quartile range = 23-36; 60.2% male). METHOD AND MEASUREMENTS: Participants completed a baseline survey (substance use and emotion regulation difficulties) and 21 days of experience sampling (three assessments daily; affect and use). We used multilevel models to assess: (1) the associations between positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) and subsequent cannabis use, (2) whether cannabis use predicted changes in affect shortly after use (at the same assessment) and (3) whether cannabis use predicted changes in affect at a later moment (at the next assessment). Next, we assessed whether emotion regulation difficulties moderated associations tested in models 1 and 2.

findingsHigher PA predicted a greater likelihood of cannabis use before the next assessment [odds ratio (OR) = 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01-1.09], and cannabis use predicted increased PA at the same assessment (b = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.27-0.92), but not at the next assessment. NA was not related to use or vice versa at group level. Emotion regulation difficulties did not statistically significantly moderate the associations between PA or NA and subsequent cannabis use; however, emotion regulation difficulties moderated short-term effects of cannabis use on NA (b = -0.014, 95% CI = -0.027 to -0.002), with individuals with higher emotion regulation difficulties showing lower NA shortly after use compared with non-use moments.

conclusionsWithin individuals who use cannabis near daily, relatively higher momentary positive affect, but not negative affect, appears to precede and follow cannabis use. Cannabis use appears to be associated with higher positive effect at the time of assessment but does not predict positive affect hours later. Individuals with greater emotion regulation difficulties may experience short-term reductions in negative effect after cannabis use.

Indexed as

AffectEmotional RegulationMarijuana SmokingMarijuana UseAdultDenmarkEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleYoung AdultaffectcannabisDERSecological momentary assessmentemotion regulationexperience sampling method

Identifiers

PMID42415540
PMCPMC13677795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.