ArticleGlobal spine journal2026
Testosterone Replacement Therapy in Posterior Lumbar Fusion Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes.
Article in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding "Testosterone Replacement Therapy in Posterior Lumbar Fusion Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes".Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor Regarding "Testosterone Replacement Therapy in Posterior Lumbar Fusion Patients: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes".Global spine journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignRetrospective Cohort study.ObjectivePosterior lumbar fusion (PLF) carries notable risks of bleeding and implant-related complications. Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) has been associated with a myriad of medical and postsurgical-related complications in orthopedic procedures, but its impact on PLF outcomes remains unclear.MethodsUsing the TriNetX Research Network, adults undergoing PLF were identified and grouped by perioperative TRT use. After 1:1 propensity score matching demographics, comorbidities, and 3,380 patients remained per cohort. Outcomes included acute postoperative events and long-term surgical sequelae, assessed through 2 years. Risk ratios (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and p-values were calculated; Kaplan-Meier curves assessed long-term event incidence.ResultsThe TRT cohort had lower rates of readmission (2.07% vs. 3.05%; RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.94; p=0.016) and ED visits (2.66% vs. 4.26%; RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49-0.83; p=0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between cohorts for DVT intensive care unit admission, PE, wound dehiscence, SSI, or AKI at 90 days. TRT use was associated with increased revision PLF (8.05% vs. 6.15%; RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.56; p=0.002). No statistically significant differences were observed for implant displacement or pseudoarthrosis.ConclusionsPerioperative TRT exposure is associated with a favorable immediate postoperative recovery timeline, with subsequent increased revision surgery. Recognition of these risks should inform preoperative counselling, postoperative surveillance, and multidisciplinary care planning for patients undergoing PLF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.