ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Deep Learning-Based Dynamic Segmentation of the Left Atrium in 4D Flow MRI.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo design a deep learning pipeline for automated, time-resolved segmentation of the left atrium (LA) from 4D flow MRI data.
methodsWe studied 100 individuals including 65 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and 35 healthy subjects (HS) resulting in 2530 4D flow MRI time-volumes acquired in different centers and scanners. In AF patients, expert data annotation was initialized on a single frame of highly resolved computed tomography data and then registered (initialization frame), propagated through time and corrected manually on 4D flow MRI, while it was performed manually in HS. Segmentation pipeline was based on a two-stage nnU-Net and was evaluated through segmentation performance metrics, as well as concordance of LA volumes through time and inner LA hemodynamics between prediction and reference segmentations.
resultsTesting on 35 AF patients and 15 HS revealed high segmentation performances (overall Dice score = 0.89 ± 0.03 for the initialization frame and 0.86 ± 0.04 for all time frames; AF patient/HS- and vendor-based Dice scores ≥ 0.86 ± 0.03 for the initialization frame and ≥ 0.83 ± 0.04 for all time frames). Strong associations and low Bland-Altman biases were obtained between predicted and reference LA volumes (r ≥ 0.89), velocities (r ≥ 0.96), stasis (r ≥ 0.99), vorticity (r ≥ 0.97), and kinetic energy (r ≥ 0.94). Interestingly, associations remained strong when comparing prediction against 4D flow-independent cine SSFP-derived LA volumes (r ≥ 0.87).
conclusionThe proposed time-resolved nnU-Net pipeline robustly and accurately segments the LA from 4D flow MRI images demonstrating excellent segmentation performance, strong agreement with reference volumes and velocity-based indices, as well as reliable generalization across vendors and patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.