ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
Development of a theory-based provider-focused training to improve HPV vaccine recommendations for young adults.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the United States (US), only 47% of young adults (18-26 y old) had initiated the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in 2022. Provider recommendation is the strongest predictor of HPV vaccination; however, limited studies have explored methods for training providers on making HPV vaccine recommendations to young adults. The purpose of this study was to obtain provider feedback on education materials for effective HPV vaccination recommendations to patients ages 18-26. Guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior and Health Belief Model, an HPV vaccine training was developed for primary care providers. Fifteen US primary care providers were recruited in 2022 for semi-structured interviews. Participants reviewed and provided feedback on the draft training. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Overall, feedback on the education materials was favorable. Participants noted learning new and useful information and appreciated the diversity of people throughout the training. General feedback included flexibility in the training format and timing due to busy schedules and providing incentives to encourage participation. There were mixed feelings toward participating in a role-play activity. Recommendations included using clear language and opportunities to make the training more persuasive. Future research is needed to refine the intervention based on provider suggestions and test the effectiveness of the intervention for improving provider recommendations for young adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.