ReviewMass spectrometry reviews2026
Comprehensive Tutorial for Computational Methods of Protein Structure Prediction Incorporating Mass Spectrometry Data.
Review in Mass spectrometry reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incorporating Surfaced-Induced Dissociation Mass Spectrometry Data into an AlphaFold-derived deep learning network improves protein structure prediction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Here we present a series of tutorials demonstrating the use of various methods which integrate structural mass spectrometry (MS) data with computational protein structure prediction methods. We give usage examples of widely used modeling frameworks, including Rosetta-based approaches (ab initio modeling, comparative modeling, and protein-protein docking) and deep learning methods such as AlphaFold2. We then describe strategies for incorporating covalent labeling, ion mobility, and surface-induced dissociation MS data into these workflows through Rosetta scoring terms and specialized applications. Finally, we provide instructions on calculating structural metrics, such as solvent accessibility, collision cross sections, and energy-resolved MS data and comparing them to actual MS data. We also introduce new PyRosetta implementations of the PARCS algorithm and the SID_ERMS_Rescore application. Together, these tutorials provide a comprehensive framework for integrating computational modeling with structural MS to enhance protein structure prediction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.