Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42415338›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2026

Dose Reduction of Ursodeoxycholic Acid in Primary Biliary Cholangitis Patients With Complete Biochemical Response: An Open-Label Randomized Clinical Trial.

Chengmei He, Yi Wei, Kunyu Zheng, Xu Wang, Jia Liu, Mengtao Li, Li Wang, Fengchun Zhang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chengmei HeDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4711-8068
Yi WeiDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5651-2901
Kunyu ZhengDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Beijing, China.
Xu WangDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Beijing, China.
Jia LiuDepartment of Medical Science and Technology Evaluation, Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Mengtao LiDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Beijing, China.
Li WangDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0899-5703
Fengchun ZhangDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Beijing, China.

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2024-I2M-C&T-B-005Capital Health development Research Special Fund 2016-4-40111Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Science 2019XK320022Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF GZC20240139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimUrsodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is first-line therapy for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), evidence for dose reduction after biochemical remission remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of UDCA reduction in PBC.

methodsIn this open-label randomized controlled clinical trial, PBC patients who reached complete biochemical response (Paris-II criteria) after ≥ 6 months of standard 13-15 mg/kg/day UDCA therapy were prospectively enrolled. Eligible patients were assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either (1) continued 13-15 mg/kg/day, (2) 10 mg/kg/day, or (3) 5-mg/kg/day UDCA. The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse rate within 12 months. Secondary endpoints included changes in liver biochemistry, changes in patient-reported symptoms, and changes in GLOBE and UK-PBC scores, as well as adverse events.

resultsFrom January 2020 to March 2024, 96 patients who complied with the protocol after randomization were analyzed. Within the 12-month follow-up period, the relapse rates in the three groups were 0%, 2.9%, and 19.4%, respectively (overall p = 0.008). Secondary outcomes showed no significant intergroup differences. In patients with a disease relapse, prompt retreatment with a standard dose of UDCA could help liver function recover. No severe adverse events were observed.

conclusionsThe relapse rate in the 5-mg/kg/day group was significantly higher than that in the standard-dose group, necessitating close clinical monitoring, and no significant difference in relapse was observed between the 10 mg/kg/day and standard-dose group, suggesting it may be a potential dose-reduction strategy, though further studies are needed for confirmation.

Indexed as

Cholagogues and CholereticsDrug TaperingLiver Cirrhosis, BiliaryUrsodeoxycholic AcidAdultAgedBiomarkersDose-Response Relationship, DrugFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecurrenceBiomarkersCholagogues and CholereticsUrsodeoxycholic Acidcost of illnessdrug taperingprimary biliary cholangitisursodeoxycholic acid

Identifiers

PMID42415338
PMCPMC13432358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.