ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026
Geometric distortion in computed tomography scans for radiotherapy: Quantification and quality assurance implications.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputed tomography (CT) is widely assumed to be geometrically accurate and is commonly used as the reference standard for quantifying geometric distortion in other imaging modalities, particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, geometric distortion in CT has not been comprehensively investigated. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to characterize the performance of a distortion phantom, establish a reference scan and, on this basis, determine and quantify the presence of geometric distortion in CT scans used for radiotherapy (RT) planning.
methodsA CIRS Model 603A Distortion Phantom was employed to quantify geometric distortion. System reproducibility, as well as the effects of phantom setup, scan parameters, fabrication uncertainty, and temporal variation were systematically evaluated. Additionally, the geometric distortion of CT was compared to that of linac-based cone-beam CT (CBCT). Subsequently, geometric distortion magnitudes from eight CT scanners were retrospectively analyzed against both CBCT and a Computer Aided Design (CAD) model.
resultsCBCT demonstrated consistently smaller distortion variation compared with CT. Retrospective analysis revealed that all eight analyzed CT scanners exhibited measurable distortion magnitudes, with mean magnitudes ranging from 0.13 mm to 0.52 mm and maximum distortion magnitudes ranging from 0.45 mm to 1.09 mm when compared to CBCT, or 0.25 mm to 0.82 mm and 0.58 mm to 1.88 mm when compared to the CAD model. Longitudinal couch inaccuracy or non-linear couch sag may constitute the primary contributors to geometric distortion on CT scanners.
conclusionsContrary to common assumptions, CT scans used for radiotherapy planning exhibit measurable geometric distortion across clinically relevant fields of view (FoVs). However, current CT QA methodologies and tolerances may lack sufficient sensitivity to detect submillimeter distortion levels relevant to stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Recognition and rigorous quantification of CT geometric distortion are essential to inform risk assessment and margin design in high-precision RT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.