ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
How Precise Is Predictive Coding for Things We Hear? Mismatch Negativity With Shepard Tones.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How Precise Is Predictive Coding for Things We Hear? Mismatch Negativity With Shepard Tones.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predictive coding is a theory that each hierarchical level of the nervous system constructs a model from bottom-up information (such as sensory inputs) and from top-down information (such as expectations and reliability of past information) and then tests new inputs against the model. If the new inputs match the model, then no change in it is required. If not, then extra brain processing is required to update the model. We tested the precision of such a model in the auditory system by using Shepard tones arranged into a discrete Shepard scale-a series of notes, each comprising sine tones of different amplitudes and one octave apart, and with each tone separated from the next by one semitone, yielding a scale that ascends or descends forever. We unpredictably and occasionally replaced an expected tone in the scale by one that was two thirds of a semitone less, one third of a semitone less, one third of a semitone more, or two thirds of a semitone more. We measured the electrical activity of 20 participants' brains with 128 scalp electrodes (electroencephalography, EEG) while the tones were delivered to their ears. We found that event-related potentials (ERPs) from 180-220 ms to these unpredictable tones were more negative the farther they were from the predicted note and more negative for tones that were less than the expected note. We conclude that the predictive model for the kind of regularity in a discrete Shepard scale has a sensitivity to tones less than one third of a semitone and is more sensitive to undershoots than to overshoots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.