ArticleArthroplasty (London, England)2026
Predicting patellar kinematics and contact forces after TKA: a simulation study on quadriceps malalignment.
Article in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatellofemoral complications remain a frequent cause of dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), despite continuous advances in implant design and surgical techniques. Abnormal patellar tracking may lead to increased contact stresses, instability, and anterior knee pain, particularly in patients with preoperative quadriceps malalignment. Subject-specific assessment tools are therefore needed to improve surgical planning and postoperative outcomes.
methodsA subject-specific multibody dynamics (MBD) framework was developed to simulate patellofemoral mechanics following TKA. A single representative patient with pronounced quadriceps malalignment was selected for this proof-of-concept study to enable detailed subject-specific modeling and experimental validation under controlled conditions. The effects of femoral and tibial component positioning, including internal/external rotation and varus/valgus alignment, were systematically evaluated. Numerical predictions were validated using a sensorized 3D-printed knee rig.
resultsQuadriceps malalignment was the primary determinant of patellar instability, leading to increased lateralization (bisect offset index up to 0.90, 25% higher than the reference condition), elevated peak contact forces (11% increase), and near-dislocation during knee extension. Valgus alignment increased peak contact forces by up to 3.6% (femur) and 2.9% (tibia) and further exacerbated lateral patellar shift, whereas internal rotation increased peak contact forces by ~ 2.2% and worsened tracking. In contrast, varus alignment and external rotation produced moderate reductions in contact forces (up to - 2.5%) and partial improvement in patellar alignment. The average total computation time was 48 s, and the simulated kinematics and contact forces showed strong agreement with the experimental measurements.
conclusionThe proposed computational framework enables rapid, subject-specific evaluation of patellofemoral mechanics and implant positioning, incorporating individual anatomical and alignment characteristics. Although demonstrated here in a proof-of-concept setting, its computational efficiency and predictive capability suggest potential for future use in intraoperative assessment and last-minute surgical optimization in TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.