Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42415208›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2026

Assessing the effects of limited vaccine supply on risk-based vaccination strategies in regions of endemic foot-and-mouth disease.

Glen Guyver-Fletcher, Mike Tildesley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Glen Guyver-FletcherZeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research (SBIDER), School of Life Sciences and Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. glen.guyver-fletcher@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9820-966X
Mike TildesleyZeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research (SBIDER), School of Life Sciences and Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is an important livestock disease that is endemic in many regions of the world, many of which struggle to supply enough vaccine doses to cover the entire population of animals at risk. We use a previously fitted stochastic metapopulation model of FMD spread, utilising high-quality data from Erzurum in Turkey, to simulate four plausible vaccine allocation strategies in the context of limited vaccine supply and endemic disease. We find that random allocation outperforms other strategies when the objective is to minimise average prevalence, and random allocation also achieves local eradication at lower doses per capita. However, all strategies perform similarly when minimising annual incidence, with the 'optimal' allocation strategy varying by doses available per capita. These results suggest that policymakers in regions of endemic FMD should focus more on sourcing high-quality vaccines and achieving high coverage, with risk-based vaccination being a secondary concern.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesEndemic DiseasesFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseVaccinationViral VaccinesAnimalsFoot-and-Mouth Disease VirusModels, BiologicalTurkeyViral VaccinescontrolepidemiologyFMDoptimisationpolicysimulationvaccines

Identifiers

PMID42415208
PMCPMC13340340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.