Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42415184›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026

Opportunities, challenges, and sustainability of lay co-research teams in low resource community settings in Sri Lanka.

Rukmi Anuradha Jayasinghe, Oshini Sri Jayasinghe, Sujani Preethika, Kusumalatha Manamperi, Ranjani Kandambi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rukmi Anuradha JayasingheWomen in Community Research (WinCR), Deniyaya, Sri Lanka. rukmi.ajayasinghe@gmail.com.
Oshini Sri JayasingheWomen in Community Research (WinCR), Deniyaya, Sri Lanka.
Sujani PreethikaWomen in Community Research (WinCR), Deniyaya, Sri Lanka.
Kusumalatha ManamperiWomen in Community Research (WinCR), Deniyaya, Sri Lanka.
Ranjani KandambiWomen in Community Research (WinCR), Deniyaya, Sri Lanka.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-led research (CLR) positions community members as active partners in generating knowledge about issues affecting their wellbeing. This approach is grounded in the principle that those closest to a problem are best placed to identify meaningful and sustainable solutions. In Sri Lanka's plantation sector, families face persistent socio-economic and health inequities, including limited access to education, nutrition, and healthcare. The Women in Community Research (WinCR) group was established to address these challenges by enabling community members to lead research, document local realities, and translate evidence into advocacy to inform policy and practice.

methodsIn 2019, two community health and development practitioners established a voluntary lay co-researcher group, WinCR, consisting of 12 women from plantation communities with an interest in research. Participants were recruited through an open invitation. A structured capacity-building programme was implemented, covering qualitative research methods, advocacy, and skills such as communication and leadership. Learning was participatory and supported through peer mentoring and continuous feedback. The group applied these skills in a community-led study on maternal and child nutrition and later expanded their work to areas including school attendance, early literacy, and early childhood development. This paper outlines the establishment and sustainability of WinCR, as well as the key opportunities and challenges encountered from February 2019 to November 2025.

resultsCLR created several opportunities. The co-researchers' lived experiences improved the cultural relevance of research tools, strengthened rapport with participants, and increased acceptance of findings. Capacity-building enhanced confidence, leadership, and recognition, leading to collaborations with government, non-governmental, and academic institutions. Key challenges included the intensive facilitation required for adult learning, low digital literacy, limited access to research materials in local languages, and initial skepticism from some professionals. Maintaining objectivity was occasionally difficult due to personal connections to the research topics. Research engagement remained focused on health, nutrition, education, and child development.

conclusionEstablishing and sustaining a lay co-researcher team in a deprived community is both feasible and valuable. CLR enhances research relevance, community ownership, and advocacy while empowering participants with new skills. Despite challenges related to training, recognition, and technological limitations, the WinCR initiative demonstrates the potential of community-led research and offers a practical model for inclusive research in underserved settings.

Indexed as

Adult learningAdvocacyCommunity empowermentCommunity engagement & involvement in research (CEI)Community-led research (CLR)Health and social inequitiesLay co-researchersParticipatory approachWomen in research

Identifiers

PMID42415184
PMCPMC13339442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.