ArticleClinical epigenetics2026
Exploring a targeted epigenetic clock based on mortality-associated CpGs as a potential biomarker for frailty.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAge-related DNA methylation changes are promising biomarkers to track the individual aging process. Particularly second-generation epigenetic clocks capture aspects of biological age more accurately, but the requirement of genome wide profiles hampers implementation into practice. We therefore aimed to develop a simplified, targeted approach based on individual age- and mortality-associated CpG sites measurable by digital PCR.
resultsWe selected three CpG sites strongly associated with all-cause mortality in the Lothian Birth Cohorts and with chronological age in multiple publicly available repositories to establish the targeted age- and mortality-associated epigenetic clock (TaM clock). For comparison, we applied a previously published three-CpG signature selected solely for correlation with chronological age (TaC clock). These signatures were initially benchmarked using DNA methylation profiles from 20 frail and 20 non-frail participants of the ActiFE cohort. In fact, in this subset the TaM clock revealed significant association between the delta age and the frailty status based on a 32-item frailty index. Furthermore, the TaM clock outperformed the TaC clock at capturing a significant increase in epigenetic age in Down syndrome, Werner syndrome and HIV. We subsequently developed digital PCR assays to analyse 446 samples from the ActiFE cohort. One TaM clock site (cg20595453) showed significant association with both mortality and frailty. However, predictions generated by either targeted clock were not significantly associated with mortality and there was no clear relationship with frailty or age-related clinical parameters in this larger cohort.
conclusionOur targeted signatures were not sensitive enough to reliably predict frailty or mortality in a relatively healthy study population, which seems to be a general challenge for epigenetic clocks. It may be necessary to include additional disease-associated target sites to support frailty analysis in personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.