ArticleImplementation science communications2026
Theorising pathways of multi-dimensional scaling for population health using implementation and complexity science perspectives.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scaling up is a complex process. As a multi-dimensional concept, it requires efforts to (1) increase population coverage (coverage), (2) expand or diversify what is included in the health service package (expansion), and/or (3) institutionalise a health innovation or new practice into health system services (institutionalisation). In this paper, we provide the theoretical basis for the model joining linear as well as complex pathways - stemming from implementation and complexity science - towards three-dimensional scaling. Our scale-up model positions expansion as the backbone for scale-up, and proposes multiple back-and-forth waves between institutionalisation and coverage. This allows an incrementalist approach, going step-by-step from one to the other scale-up dimension, as well as a multi-player complexity approach, emphasising the interactions between scale-up dimensions and actors involved, to achieving population health. By offering a dual incrementalist-complexity focus, we acknowledge that there is a starting point to scale-up, and thus path dependency, in addition to highly contextual cultural, historical, socio-political, and economic forces that underpin population health and any attempt at scaling up access and integration of health services, thereby pointing at their fragmented and incomplete nature. The visualisation and underlying hypotheses offer speculation on potential pathways for scale-up, which are key processes to understand and untangle in future research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.