ArticleMolecular brain2026
Comparative analysis of procedural variations in the social defeat stress paradigm in mice: effects of post-defeat housing conditions and aggressor exposure duration.
Article in Molecular brain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The chronic social defeat stress (CSDS) paradigm is widely used to model psychosocial stress in rodents. Procedural variations across studies may contribute to diverse behavioral outcomes, underscoring the need to clarify the experimental conditions that influence specific behaviors toward establishing a valid animal model. In this study, we examined the effects of post-defeat housing conditions and aggressor exposure duration, two procedural parameters in the CSDS paradigm, on behavior. Adult male C57BL/6 J mice were subjected to chronic SDS for 10 consecutive days under different conditions varying in (i) post-defeat housing (complete separation from an ICR aggressor vs. cohabitation with the aggressor under sensory contact) and (ii) duration of direct contact with aggressor (short exposure: 5 min vs. long exposure: 10 min). A battery of behavioral tests to assess social interaction and anxiety- and depression-related behaviors was conducted after the CSDS procedures. The proportion of mice classified as susceptible or resilient after CSDS did not differ significantly between the post-defeat housing (separation and cohabitation) groups or between the short- and long-contact duration groups. Regardless of the experimental condition, susceptible mice showed increased body weight, reduced social interaction, and decreases in the distance traveled and time spent in center area in the open field test compared with non-stressed controls, whereas no marked differences were observed in behavioral measures in the forced swim and tail suspension tests. Procedural variations led to differences in behavioral outcomes, with both the cohabitation and long-contact duration groups showing reduced distance traveled and less time spent in the center area in the open field test compared with the separation and short-contact duration groups, respectively. These results demonstrate that procedural variations in the CSDS paradigm shape certain behavioral phenotypes, suggesting that cohabitation and long duration of direct contact with aggressor are effective conditions for producing more pronounced and reproducible behavioral changes. These findings highlight the importance of carefully controlling procedural parameters to obtain reproducible CSDS mouse models and that the stress-induced behavioral changes consistently observed represent characteristic features of this model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.