ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Automated lung cancer classification using intensity-driven RoI selection and transfer learning.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer diagnosis increasingly relies on advanced medical imaging systems and expert interpretation across heterogeneous clinical data sources. However, accurate clinical decision-making remains challenging due to variations in expert judgment and the complexity of extracting discriminative patterns from electronic health records and radiological datasets. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an enhanced lung cancer classification framework that leverages intensity-driven region-of-interest (RoI) selection from publicly available benchmark datasets, including the Lung Image Database Consortium Image Collection (LIDC-IDRI) and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). The proposed methodology incorporates customized label refinement and precise annotation of vulnerable RoI regions to capture clinically relevant features associated with malignant nodules. A high-dimensional RoI mapping strategy is employed to improve feature representation and discrimination. Furthermore, a feedback-driven optimization mechanism is integrated within a transfer learning framework to iteratively refine model parameters and enhance learning stability. The optimized RoI representations are transferred to customized deep learning models, enabling efficient knowledge reuse and robust decision-making. The proposed approach is implemented using the CoVNet architecture and evaluated under a 60:40 training-testing split. Experimental results demonstrate a classification accuracy of 97.84%, validating the effectiveness of the proposed framework in improving predictive performance for lung cancer classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.