Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42415103›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026

Automated lung cancer classification using intensity-driven RoI selection and transfer learning.

Syed Thouheed Ahmed, T Y Satheesha, Lakshmi Hassan Nagaraja, Achyut Shankar, Ashwani Kumar, Afifa Salsabil Fathima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Syed Thouheed AhmedSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, REVA University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. syedthouheed@reva.edu.in.
T Y SatheeshaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, REVA University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Lakshmi Hassan NagarajaDepartment of CSE (AI&ML), CVR College of Engineering, Hyderabad, India.
Achyut ShankarSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Technology, Bennett University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201310, India.
Ashwani KumarSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Technology, Bennett University, Greater, Noida, India.
Afifa Salsabil FathimaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, REVA University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer diagnosis increasingly relies on advanced medical imaging systems and expert interpretation across heterogeneous clinical data sources. However, accurate clinical decision-making remains challenging due to variations in expert judgment and the complexity of extracting discriminative patterns from electronic health records and radiological datasets. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an enhanced lung cancer classification framework that leverages intensity-driven region-of-interest (RoI) selection from publicly available benchmark datasets, including the Lung Image Database Consortium Image Collection (LIDC-IDRI) and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). The proposed methodology incorporates customized label refinement and precise annotation of vulnerable RoI regions to capture clinically relevant features associated with malignant nodules. A high-dimensional RoI mapping strategy is employed to improve feature representation and discrimination. Furthermore, a feedback-driven optimization mechanism is integrated within a transfer learning framework to iteratively refine model parameters and enhance learning stability. The optimized RoI representations are transferred to customized deep learning models, enabling efficient knowledge reuse and robust decision-making. The proposed approach is implemented using the CoVNet architecture and evaluated under a 60:40 training-testing split. Experimental results demonstrate a classification accuracy of 97.84%, validating the effectiveness of the proposed framework in improving predictive performance for lung cancer classification.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsClassification AlgorithmsHumansCNN modelIntensity segmentationLung cancer classificationRoITransfer learningUDC-IDRI dataset

Identifiers

PMID42415103
PMCPMC13637333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.