ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Generating Alzheimer's narratives using large language models.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnalyzing semi-spontaneous speech is a promising direction for supporting Alzheimer's disease (AD) assessment, yet progress is limited by the scarcity of annotated clinical data. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer new opportunities to generate synthetic narratives that may resemble speech patterns of both patients with AD and healthy controls during cognitive evaluation tasks such as the Cookie Theft Picture description.
methodsThis study evaluates whether models including GPT, T5/Flan-T5, LLaMA, Mistral, and Qwen can generate clinically plausible picture-description narratives under two configurations: Human-to-Bot, where an LLM responds directly to real interviewer prompts, and Bot-to-Bot, where two LLMs simulate both interviewer and participant roles. Models were fine-tuned on transcripts from the DementiaBank Pitt Corpus and assessed using lexical and semantic metrics, as well as human expert ratings. Generated narratives were further used to augment training data for an AD vs. healthy control classifier based on BERT embeddings and an MLP architecture.
resultsLLMs differed substantially in their ability to reproduce clinically meaningful and semantically coherent narratives of patient-interviewer interactions. Mistral, LLaMA, and Qwen achieved the strongest automatic evaluation metrics, e.g., BERTScores above 0.90 in the Human-to-Bot condition-and produced narratives rated by human experts as fluent, plausible, and diagnostically informative. When combining real and synthetic narratives for classifier training, the highest F1-score reached 0.84, outperforming models trained on real data alone (F1 = 0.74). Synthetic data generated in Human-to-Bot settings contributed most to diagnostic improvements, whereas Bot-to-Bot interactions exhibited greater variability and reduced clinical realism.
conclusionLLMs can generate high-quality synthetic narratives that enhance downstream AD classification and show promising clinical plausibility in cognitive assessment contexts. Incorporating LLM-generated data provides a scalable strategy for mitigating data scarcity in dementia research. Future work should focus on improving fully synthetic dialogue quality, expanding multilingual capabilities, and refining evaluation frameworks to better capture clinically relevant linguistic features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.