Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42415054›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2026

Migraine and risk of adverse obstetric outcomes: a matched cohort study of English linked electronic health records.

Katherine Phillips, Megha Singh, Siang Ing Lee, Nadia Sarween, Kelly-Ann Eastwood, Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo, Benjamin Wakerley, Lakshrieni Nishshanka, Neil Cockburn, Francesca L Crowe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Katherine PhillipsDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. k.phillips.1@bham.ac.uk.
Megha SinghDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Siang Ing LeeDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Nadia SarweenDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Kelly-Ann EastwoodCentre for Public Health, Queen's University of Belfast, BT7 1NN, Belfast, UK.
Arturo Gonzalez-IzquierdoDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Benjamin WakerleyDepartment of Metabolism and Systems Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Lakshrieni NishshankaDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Neil CockburnDepartment of Applied Health, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Francesca L CroweDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Krishnarajah NirantharakumarDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExisting literature suggests a link between migraine and various adverse pregnancy outcomes, but findings remain inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate the association between pre-pregnancy migraine and obstetric outcomes.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study used linked electronic health records from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) maternity data. We included women aged 15-50 years in England with singleton deliveries between 2000 and 2019. Deliveries from women with a recorded migraine diagnosis before pregnancy were matched 1:1 by maternal age to those without migraine. Logistic regression models, adjusted for demographic and clinical factors, were used to examine associations with preterm birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age (SGA), mode of delivery, and stillbirth.

resultsThe cohort included 428,217 deliveries from 317,016 women, comprising 46,560 (10.9%) migraine-exposed deliveries and an equal number of matched controls. No significant association was found between pre-pregnancy migraine and preterm birth (aOR 1.04(0.99-1.09)), although migraine appeared to have a protective effect against very preterm birth (aOR 0.83(0.73-0.95)). Pre-pregnancy migraine was associated with increased odds of iatrogenic preterm birth (aOR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.04-1.18), but not spontaneous preterm birth (aOR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.91-1.03). Migraine was associated with a significant increase in the odds of pre-eclampsia (aOR 1.17 (95% CI 1.07-1.27)). There were no notable associations with low birth weight (1500-2500 g) (aOR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.95-1.09), very low (1000-1500 g) or extremely low birth weight (< 1000 g), SGA (aOR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89-1.03), or stillbirth (aOR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.81-1.24). No significant association was seen between migraine and elective caesarean section (aOR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.99-1.09).

conclusionPre-pregnancy migraine was associated with increased odds of iatrogenic preterm birth and pre-eclampsia. Associations with other outcomes were small and uncertain. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying these findings and their clinical relevance.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMigraine DisordersPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePremature BirthAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeMiddle AgedPregnancyMigrainepregnancy complicationspreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID42415054
PMCPMC13637312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.