ArticleBMC health services research2026
Coverage, pricing, and reimbursement of telemedicine: a qualitative study among implementers of the Akoma Pa mHealth-based telemedicine intervention in Ghana.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare systems are rapidly using digital health technologies, such as mHealth-based telemedicine, as digitalization in healthcare provision advances. However, there is limited knowledge of the pricing and reimbursement mechanisms for these health interventions, especially in the Global South. This study aimed to investigate healthcare professionals' perspectives on the coverage, pricing, and reimbursement of telemedicine services in Ghana.
methodsThis study used a qualitative exploratory design. Multistage sampling was employed. All 46 sampled Christian Health Association of Ghana (CHAG) health facilities across Ghana, with a focus on the "Akoma Pa Champions", were invited; 29 responded and participated, at which point data saturation was reached. Data collection was done in February 2024 through semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was done using ATLAS.ti.
resultsParticipants shared that the Akoma Pa intervention targeted hypertensive and diabetic patients, offering free medications and services, but limited drug options raised concerns. Pricing was absent, with free services, although participants debated whether mHealth should be priced less or at the same rate as traditional care. Reimbursement lacked structure and offered only modest non-monetary incentives, while in some cases, others received nothing. Funded by a non-governmental organization (NGO), the project boosted patient attendance through cost savings but faced challenges, including internet issues, patient skepticism, and limited scope. Suggestions from participants included integrating the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS), expanding disease coverage, and increasing investment for sustainability.
conclusionThe Akoma Pa intervention improves access to care for hypertensive and diabetic patients in Ghana by reducing costs and increasing engagement. However, its sustainability is limited by a narrow scope, a lack of pricing frameworks, dependence on external funding, and connectivity issues. Expanding its scope, integrating with NHIS, establishing an adequate regulatory framework, and investing in infrastructure can enhance its impact and scalability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.