Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42415030›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Assessment of the patient safety culture and the influencing factors among medical staff in a non-public tertiary general hospital in China.

Qiannan Zhao, Chenxiao Zhu, Ting Li, Jiahui Fu, Huahua Wei, Manyun Zhang, Yanjun Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qiannan Zhao *Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chenxiao Zhu *Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ting LiPeking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiahui FuPeking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huahua WeiPeking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.
Manyun ZhangPeking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yanjun YangPeking University International Hospital, Beijing, China. bd-yangyanjun151@pkucare.com.

Funding

Peking University International Hospital Grant No.: 2025-KY-0124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the rapid development of non-public tertiary general hospitals in China, the construction of patient safety culture has become a priority to narrow the gap with public hospitals in terms of patient safety management, however, the current driving factors have not been identified. This study aimed to evaluate the current status of patient safety culture in a non-public tertiary general hospital and to identify the principal influencing factors. In addition, the study sought to verify the construct validity of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) scale adapted for samples from non-public tertiary hospitals.

methodsA cross-sectional survey on patient safety culture was conducted among 840 medical staff members in a non-public tertiary general hospital from June to August 2025 using the Chinese version of the HSOPSC scale, which comprises six dimensions and 39 items. Stratified cluster sampling was adopted, with stratification first performed according to clinical departments, followed by cluster sampling, with each department treated as a sampling cluster. Item screening and scale optimization were conducted through item discrimination analysis, factor loading evaluation, and reliability assessment. One-way analysis of variance was applied for the preliminary comparison of the total mean patient safety culture scores across medical staff with different characteristics. Statistically significant variables from the one-way analysis were included in a multivariate logistic regression model to identify independent factors affecting the perception of patient safety culture. Department type, working tenure, and professional category were taken as the core independent variables, and their impacts on the perception of team patient safety culture were evaluated.

resultsFollowing adjustment and refinement, the revised HSOPSC scale retained 29 items and demonstrated an overall Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.95. The overall positive response rate for "Patient Safety Culture" was 66.65%. "Managerial Support for Patient Safety" (77.70%), "Colleague Collaboration" (76.15%), and "Communication" (75.43%) were strengths, whereas "Staff Recognition of Hospital Safety Culture" (58.21%) and "Incident Reporting" (66.47%) were weaknesses. Multivariate analysis identified department as an independent influencing factor. Medical staff in critical care (OR = 0.42), laboratory (OR = 0.25), and platform departments (OR = 0.49) had significantly lower safety culture perception (P < 0.05).

conclusionPatient safety culture in the non-public tertiary general hospital is at a moderate level, with marked departmental differences. Future interventions should prioritize fostering a non-punitive reporting environment, improving staffing in high-risk units, and strengthening interdepartmental communication and collaboration to enhance the overall patient safety culture climate.

Indexed as

Hospitals, GeneralMedical Staff, HospitalOrganizational CulturePatient SafetySafety ManagementTertiary Care CentersAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCross-sectional studyInfluencing factorsNon-public hospitalPatient safety culture

Identifiers

PMID42415030
PMCPMC13632082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.