Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42415010›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2026

Assessment of the anatomical relationship of the roots of maxillary molars and the floor of maxillary sinus using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the Saudi sub-population.

Amal Almohaimede, Noura A Alsufyani, Fathima Fazrina Farook, Sarah M Alkahtany, Sundus Bukhary, Lamya M Alhomaidhi, Sara Alswayyed, Shatha Alfarraj, Shoq Alolayan, Shouq Jurays

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amal AlmohaimedeDepartment of Restorative Dental Science, Endodontic Division, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. aalmohaimede@ksu.edu.sa.
Noura A AlsufyaniDepartment of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fathima Fazrina FarookCollege of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Prince Mutib Ibn Abdullah Ibn Abdulaziz Rd, Ar Rimayah, Riyadh, 14611, Saudi Arabia.
Sarah M AlkahtanyDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, Endodontic Division, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, PO Box 68004, Riyadh, 11527, Saudi Arabia.
Sundus BukharyDepartment of Restorative Dental Science, Endodontic Division, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, 13313, Saudi Arabia.
Lamya M AlhomaidhiPrivate sector, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sara AlswayyedPrivate sector, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Shatha AlfarrajDepartment of Endodontics, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Shoq AlolayanSajer General Hospital, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Shouq JuraysMinistry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to assess the relationship between the roots of the maxillary molars and the maxillary sinus floor in a Saudi subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

methodsThe study was conducted at the Dental University Hospital of King Saud University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A sample of 220 Saudi patients who attended the Dental University Hospital between January 2009 and January 2024 and had CBCT images was included. The vertical relationship between the maxillary sinus floor and the root apices of the maxillary molars was assessed using the classification of Kwak et al. Vertical distances were recorded on both sides for each maxillary molar root.

resultsA total of 880 maxillary molars and 2640 individual roots were analyzed. The linear mixed-effects model showed a significant effect for tooth root on root-to-sinus distance (p < 0.001). Age group demonstrated a significant overall effect in the model; however, no pairwise comparisons between age groups remained statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. No significant effect of gender was observed. The roots of the maxillary second molars are closer to the maxillary sinus. Type 2 was the most frequently observed relationship among maxillary molars in both genders.

conclusionsThe shortest root-to-sinus distance was observed among the roots of the maxillary second molars. These findings highlight the value of CBCT imaging in preoperative clinical assessment for identifying high-risk cases, thereby modifying treatment planning and reducing the likelihood of sinus-related complications.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyMaxillaMaxillary SinusMolarTooth RootAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSaudi ArabiaYoung AdultCone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)Endodontic anatomyMaxillary molarsMaxillary sinusRoot-sinus relationship

Identifiers

PMID42415010
PMCPMC13628867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.