ArticleBMC nursing2026
The effect of nurses' perception of decent work on sickness presenteeism and work-related flow experiences.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNurses' vitality, perceptions of decent work, and sickness presenteeism play a crucial role in patient safety and quality of care. However, these factors remain underexplored in the literature, underscoring the need for further research to examine the relationships among them. The study aims to examine the relationships between nurses' perceptions of decent work, sickness presenteeism and work-related flow experiences.
methodsThe study used a cross-sectional, correlational design. A sample of 374 nurses employed at a university hospital in a province of Turkey was selected using convenience sampling. Data were collected using the Decent Work Scale, Sickness Presenteeism Scale-Nurse, The Work-Related Flow Inventory, on an Introductory Information Form. Pearson correlation analysis, multiple linear regression, independent samples t-test, and one-way ANOVA were conducted.
resultsA positive correlation was found between the total scores of the decent work scale and the work-related flow inventory. in addition, a weak significant correlation was found between the total scores of the sickness presenteeism scale-nurses and the work-related flow scale. According to the results of multiple linear regression analysis decent work significantly positively predicts work-related flow (β = 0.327, t = 6.84, p < 0.001). On the other hand, sickness presenteeism significantly negatively predicts work-related flow (β = -0.211, t = -4.42, p < 0.001).
conclusionDecent work was positively associated with concentration and engagement at work, while sickness presenteeism was negatively associated with work-related flow. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.