ArticleBMC nursing2026
Evaluation of intensive care nurses' attitudes toward the importance of care-focused nurse-patient interaction and associated factors.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntensive care units, where critically ill patients are treated, are dynamic units equipped with high technology. The quality of intensive care is greatly dependent on the effectiveness and quality of nursing care. The level of ongoing verbal and behavioral interaction between the nurse and the patient affects the quality of care of an intensive care unit.
aimThis study aimed to evaluate intensive care nurses' self-reported perceptions regarding the importance of care-focused nurse-patient interaction during the pandemic period, along with associated factors. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThe research group included nurses working in the intensive care units of a university hospital on the European side of Istanbul and the intensive care units of a state hospital located in the same region, under ov-19 pandemic conditions. The study data were collected using the "Nurse Information Form" and the importance dimension and 10 subscales of the "Caring Nurse-Patient Interaction" (CNPI) Scale. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Research ethics approval was obtained, and the participants provided informed consent.
resultsIt was found that the nurses' average age was 31.25 ± 6.97 and that their mean length of service in the intensive care unit was 4.87 ± 3.58 years. It was determined that 80.4% of the participants chose to work in intensive care of their own accord, and that 44.1% were able to establish team collaboration in intensive care. During COVID-19 pandemic 69.6% nurses worked 40 h or more per week. In the study, the total score for the importance dimension of the Caring Nurse-Patient Interaction Scale was found to be 274.87 ± 44.98. It was determined that not choosing to work in intensive care decreased the total importance score 29.8-point and that failure to establish team collaboration decreased the same total score 31-point.
conclusionsIn this study conducted during the pandemic, intensive care nurses reported positive perceptions regarding the importance of care-focused nurse-patient interaction and evaluated nurse-patient interaction as an important factor in intensive care. It was concluded that, in order to strengthen care-focused nurse-patient interaction, the choice to work in intensive care should be left to nurses, duties, working hours, and authority should be clarified in accordance with ethical principles, and team collaboration should be supported under all circumstances. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.