Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42414966›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026

A multicenter machine learning model for predicting ICU mortality in mechanically ventilated patients: development and external validation.

Yi Zhang, Xu Chen, Xinghan Tian, Hui Zhao

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yi Zhang *Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, HeFei, AnHui province, China.
Xu Chen *Intensive Care Unit, Qingdao University Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, YanTai, ShanDong Province, China.
Xinghan TianIntensive Care Unit, Qingdao University Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, YanTai, ShanDong Province, China. tianfenger987@sina.com.
Hui ZhaoRespiratory and Critical Care Medicine Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, HeFei, AnHui province, China. efyzhaohui@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate early prediction of mortality in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients remains challenging due to disease heterogeneity and dynamic clinical trajectories. Traditional severity scoring systems have limited flexibility and generalizability. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a machine learning-based model using routinely available clinical variables to predict ICU mortality in mechanically ventilated patients.

methodsA retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted using the MIMIC database as the development cohort, with external validation performed in the eICU Collaborative Research Database and an independent institutional cohort. Adult ICU patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation were included. A two-step feature selection strategy combining least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and recursive feature elimination was applied to identify robust predictors. Six machine learning algorithms were compared, and a random forest model was selected. Model performance was evaluated using discrimination, calibration, decision curve analysis, time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), and concordance index (C-index). Model interpretability was assessed using SHAP analysis.

resultsA total of 21 predictors were selected for model development. The random forest model demonstrated superior overall performance compared with alternative algorithms. In external validation, the model showed favorable early discrimination, with near-perfect AUC values during the first 48 hours in the local cohort and consistently acceptable performance in the eICU cohort. Predictive performance attenuated over time, particularly in the local cohort, whereas temporal stability was observed in the multicenter dataset. Calibration and decision curve analyses supported the reliability and clinical utility of the model. Key predictors included age, markers of respiratory dysfunction, metabolic stress, organ failure, and treatment intensity.

conclusionsThe proposed random forest model provides accurate and interpretable admission-time risk stratification for ICU mortality in mechanically ventilated patients. We recommend its use as an admission triage and screening tool for identifying high-risk patients within the first 48 hours of ICU admission. While predictive performance declined over time, the model demonstrated robust early risk stratification and generalizability across independent cohorts, highlighting its potential value for early clinical decision support in critical care settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable. This study was an observational retrospective cohort study and was not registered as a clinical trial.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningRespiration, ArtificialAgedClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesExternal validationICU mortalityMachine learningMechanical ventilationRandom forestRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID42414966
PMCPMC13628788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.