ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Surgically treated metacarpal fractures in adults: a study with 3286 cases based on the Swedish National Quality Registry for Hand Surgery.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNo international consensus regarding optimal non-surgical or surgical treatment of metacarpal fractures exists. Surgical outcome using patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) from national registers with large surgically treated population have rarely been reported. We present demographics and patient-reported outcomes in relation to fixation methods for surgically treated metacarpal fractures, using data from the Swedish National Quality Registry for Hand Surgery (HAKIR).
methodsIn a retrospective analysis of a prospective collected dataset, patients aged ≥ 18 years with surgically treated metacarpal fractures registered in HAKIR during 2010-2022 were included (fracture types currently unknown), excluding reoperations and fractures associated with other injuries. PROMs (QuickDASH and HQ-8 routinely used) were collected at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Data were compared with Chi-squared, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and PROM changes over time were expressed as effect size.
resultsIn 3,286 analyzed cases, male patients were more frequently treated than females. Males were significantly younger than females (p < 0.001). Outcome, measured with QuickDASH, showed significant improvement from 3 (median: 15.9, interquartile range [IQR]: 6.8-31.8) to 12 months (median: 8.0, IQR: 2.3-20.5) (p < 0.001) with no significant differences between fractures in thumb, fingers, and multiple fractures at 12 months. QuickDASH scores at 12 months showed no significant differences between fixation methods. Outcome between open and closed fractures did not differ. K-wire/cerclage (61%) was most frequently used fixation method (plate fixation (16%), screw fixation (11%) with a significant variation between hospitals, e.g., variation K-wire/cerclage use: 29%-80% (p < 0.001). At 12 months, only HQ-8 item weakness showed significantly better outcome for screws without plating compared to K-wire/cerclage (p = 0.048).
conclusionBased on national register data from a larger surgically treated population, good patient-reported outcome is expected one year after surgery for isolated metacarpal fractures with K-wire/cerclage being most common surgical fixation method. Despite notable national variation in fixation methods, likely influenced by currently unknown fracture types and possibly other confounding factors, no overall differences in outcome based on the PROM QuickDASH were observed. However, less weakness was noted 12 months postoperatively following screw fixation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.