Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42414914›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026

Predictors of a prolonged puncture-wire time in patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI).

Merve Günes-Altan, Stephan Achenbach, Johannes Michael Altstidl, Maximilian Moshage, Henry Strupp, Lennart Lorenz, Stephan Scholl, Mohamed Marwan, Monique Troebs, Luise Gaede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Merve Günes-AltanDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany. merve.guenes-altan@uk-erlangen.de.
Stephan AchenbachDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Johannes Michael AltstidlDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Maximilian MoshageDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Henry StruppDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Lennart LorenzDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Stephan SchollDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Mohamed MarwanDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Monique TroebsDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Luise GaedeDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), rapid reperfusion is essential for optimal outcomes, yet factors influencing intraprocedural delays remain insufficiently investigated.

methodsIn this single-center retrospective study, consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2015 and 2024 were analyzed. Prolonged time between vascular puncture and wire passage (puncture-wire time; PWT) was defined as a value in the fourth quartile of the study population (>17.1 minutes). Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors and procedural determinants of prolonged PWT.

resultsA total of 1,235 patients (70.7% male, median age 64.5 years [IQR 56.0-75.25]) were included. Radial-to-femoral access crossover (OR 2.539, 95% CI 1.381-4.665, p = 0.003), arterial kinking or severe radial spasm (OR 3.669, 95% CI 1.986-6.778, p < 0.001) and challenging revascularization of the culprit lesion (OR 2.330, 95% CI 1.319-4.116, p = 0.004) were independently associated with prolonged PWT. Direct intervention of the culprit lesion was independently associated with a lower likelihood of prolonged PWT (OR 0.445, 95% CI 0.201 - 0.988, p = 0.047). In contrast, the primary choice of vascular access (radial vs. femoral) was not associated with prolonged PWT (p=0.06).

conclusionWhile some factors are system- or patient-dependent, early recognition of procedural difficulties and individualized access-site decision making may help minimize procedural delays. In selected patients, a primary femoral access route may be considered, and direct intervention of the culprit lesion should be pursued to minimize PWT. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationCatheterization, PeripheralFemoral ArteryPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRadial ArteryST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionTime-to-TreatmentAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPuncturesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)Puncture-to-wire time, Reperfusion delayST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

Identifiers

PMID42414914
PMCPMC13343796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.