Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42414895›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2026

Models of care for palliative care in residential aged care facilities: a scoping review.

Ishka de Silva, Catriona Parker, Peter Poon

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ishka de SilvaMonash University, Wellington Rd, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Catriona ParkerMonash University, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Catriona.Parker@monash.edu.
Peter PoonMonash University, Wellington Rd, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the number of older people living in residential aged care facilities continues to rise, it is essential that facilities can provide high quality palliative care. However, unmet palliative care needs in residential aged care facilities are leading to inadequate end-of-life care and causing poor outcomes for older people. Various models of care are being implemented to try and address this challenge. This review aims to synthesise existing models of palliative care delivery in the residential aged care sector, to understand how best to provide palliative care in this setting.

methodsA search of three databases (OVID Medline, Psych Info and CINAHL) between January 2009 to June 2024 found 1585 sources and 30 met the inclusion criteria of describing and/or evaluating a model of care for delivering palliative care services to people over the age of 65 years old in the residential aged care sector. Data was extracted related to model characteristics, evidence-basis, implementation factors, and evaluation outcomes.

resultsThe review identified 23 unique models of care. The models were categorised based on the principal service provider. Care was delivered either internally by the residential aged care facility (n = 14), or externally by community-based (n = 5) or hospital-based (n = 4) services. Models were developed using a range of methodologies, including based on literature, consensus-building techniques and establishing expert working groups. Services had been implemented in a range of different contexts, including metropolitan and rural settings and face-to-face or via telehealth. The evaluated models did not provide high-quality evidence of improved clinical outcomes.

conclusionThere are a range of evidence-based models of care that describe comprehensive palliative care service delivery in residential aged care facilities. They have been implemented in various contexts. No model has demonstrated a high quality of evidence that it improves outcomes. Future work is needed to know how best to provide palliative care to RACF residents. This future work should be grounded in implementation science.

Indexed as

Homes for the AgedNursing HomesPalliative CareAgedHumansModels of carePalliative careResidential aged careScoping review

Identifiers

PMID42414895
PMCPMC13628723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.