ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Root physiological, biochemical and untargeted metabolomic responses of five forage pea (Pisum sativum L.) varieties at seedling stage to saline-alkali stress in Qaidam salinized soil.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil salinization in the Qaidam Basin represents a significant abiotic stressor that restricts the growth, development, and yield of forage pea (Pisum sativum L.). This study evaluated five forage pea genotypes grown under naturally salinized field conditions in the Qaidam Basin (mean electrical conductivity (EC) 4.5-7.0 dS·m⁻¹, total salt 2.37 g·kg⁻¹). Given the absence of a non-saline control, our analyses primarily focused on genotypic differences in morphological, physiological, and metabolic traits under salinized soil rather than establishing causal stress-response relationships. By integrating morphological phenotyping, physiological and biochemical assays, and untargeted metabolomics, we systematically compared performance and root metabolic profiles among the five genotypes. Significant differences in saline-alkali tolerance-related traits were observed among the five genotypes (P < 0.05). Based on comprehensive assessment of multiple growth traits (plant height, root length, lateral root number, and field emergence rate), Qingjian No. 1 and Dingwan No. 8 were identified as genotypes exhibiting superior performance under salinized conditions, with GH8 demonstrating the best performance in plant height (12.50 ± 0.90 cm) and root length (11.80 ± 1.30 cm). Conversely, Grassland No. 7 and Grassland No. 23 were classified as less adapted genotypes, with GH23 exhibiting the shortest plant height (5.40 ± 0.50 cm) and root length (4.00 ± 0.80 cm), indicating severe growth suppression. At the physiological level, GH8 and GH12 exhibited the highest 2,2'-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) radical scavenging activity; GH8 accumulated the highest levels of soluble protein, soluble sugar, and proline (proline: 250.0 µg·g⁻¹); whereas GH1 and GH8 showed the lowest malondialdehyde accumulation. Untargeted metabolomic analysis identified 5,193 non-redundant metabolites, with amino acids and their derivatives constituting 31.25% of the core category. A total of 75 common differential metabolites were identified across genotypes. Root length, lateral root number, catalase activity, soluble sugar content, and secondary metabolite accumulation emerged as key indicators for evaluating genotypic performance under salinized conditions. This study provides a multi-trait comparative analysis of forage pea genotypes grown in naturally salinized soil of the Qaidam Basin and reveals the physiological and metabolic patterns underlying genotypic differences, offering a theoretical basis for salt-tolerant variety breeding in high-altitude salinized regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.