ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2026
Smilodon sabertooth bite marks, new perspectives on prey-predator models in South American Pleistocene.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditionally, saber-toothed cats, particularly species of the genus Smilodon, were considered unable to bite through bones due to the apparent fragility of their teeth. We analyze here megafauna fossil remains of Salto de Piedra palaeontological site (Humid Pampas), one of the few extensively radiometrically dated Pleistocene sites in Argentina and systematically excavated. Salto de Piedra is located near contemporary human occupation sites that have yielded megafauna remains. This spatial and chronological proximity provides an exceptional scenario to compare the prey ranges hunted by humans and by Smilodon.
resultsHere we provide Smilodon populator tooth mark patterning on their megaherbivore preys. Mark morphology demonstrates that Smilodon canines penetrated and processed cortical bone, refuting interpretations that considered them functionally fragile. These tooth marks have been compared with other carnivores and saber-toothed felid fossil sites. This spatial and chronological control provides direct evidence of predatory activity and constrains its temporal span, enabling evaluation of the ecological role of this hypercarnivore.
conclusionThis extraordinary discovery provides direct evidence of Smilodon 's predation, and confirms that it was an apex predator, focused almost exclusively on megafauna. These tooth marks can be identified and extrapolated to other fossil sites. Furthermore, this diagnostic tooth-mark pattern enables reconstruction of prey preferences. Our results indicate that Smilodon exerted sustained predatory pressure across a broad range of megaherbivores. Despite the spatial proximity and temporal overlap between Smilodon predation (22.2-13.3 ka BP) at Salto de Piedra and human arrival to this area (~ 14 ka BP), no interactions between these two predators has been observed indicating certain avoidance between them. The complex predator-prey trophic interactions during the Late Pleistocene-Holocene transition in the Pampas region of South America, support multicausal models, integrating ecological and anthropogenic drivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.