ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2026
Relationship trust in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a network analysis approach.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study was to assess the pattern of mutual relations within the Relationship Trust Scale (RTS) in a sample of individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis.
methodsThe participants comprised 189 individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (M
resultsThe results indicated that, in terms of strength, the Cares node (Item: "My partner cares about my worries, feelings, joys, and troubles") had the highest strength in the network. Furthermore, regarding expected influence, the analysis revealed that the Cares node had the highest expected influence in the network, followed by the Availability node (Item: "Whenever I am upset my partner is always available, supportive, and I feel like he/she's there for me"), and Consideration in Decisions node (Item: "My partner takes me into account when making a decision."). Also, the Cares node had the strongest associations with Consideration in Decisions, Safety, and Respect nodes. Network stability analyses indicated that interpretations should be focused primarily on expected influence (CS-coefficient = 0.286), which exceeded the minimum recommended threshold (Epskamp et al., 2018), while other centrality indices showed lower stability. Betweenness and closeness centrality were not interpreted, as these measures may be conceptually unsuitable for psychological networks (Bringmann et al., 2019). All findings should be considered exploratory and preliminary.
conclusionThese exploratory findings appear to highlight potentially relevant relationship processes among individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis that may be targeted to improve the overall quality of their relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42414836What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.