Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42414811›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Moving beyond discrete categories in motor cognition.

Roland Pfister, Greg Huffman, James R Brockmole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roland PfisterExperimental Psychology, Trier University, Trier, Germany. roland.pfister@uni-trier.de.
Greg HuffmanScoring Technologies, St. George, UT, USA.
James R BrockmoleDepartment of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft PF853/10-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft PF853/11-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theories on human action control assume the human mind copes with the computational challenge of selecting and performing goal-directed movements by recycling previous action plans. Feature binding assists this recycling by integrating stimulus and response features into episodic representations. Perhaps surprisingly, however, previous evidence for binding and retrieval is confined to categorical perceptual and motor features that define coarse-grained decisions. Here we show that such episodic representations can also incorporate continuous, metric information. These conclusions emerge from two experiments in which participants performed whole-arm pointing movements to varying target locations with their left or right hand. Short inter-trial distances between successive locations benefitted response repetitions (i.e., responding with the same hand in consecutive trials) whereas increasing distances benefitted response changes. This effect emerged as a direct function of metric distance. Feature binding and retrieval thus seem to go beyond categorical decision making, either by including metric information about current stimulation or by providing direct access to an agent's motor repertoire.

Indexed as

CognitionMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultFeature binding and retrievalMotor controlPerception and action

Identifiers

PMID42414811
PMCPMC13342318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.