ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Aetiology of early implant failure: a scoping review.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis scoping review aimed (i) to identify and synthesise the reported aetiological factors involved in early dental implant failure and (ii) to propose a structured classification of these aetiologies. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies included clinical studies in adult humans reporting implant loss occurring within 6 months and before prosthetic loading. Data extraction focused on study design, population characteristics, failure criteria, and reported aetiological factors.
resultsA total of 1,838 articles were identified, 962 articles were screened after deduplication, 28 articles was assessed for eligibility and finally 8 were included. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in the definition and assessment of early implant failure. The findings indicate that early implant loss is multifactorial, involving three interacting aetiological domains: local, systemic, and procedural factors. Local factors were mainly related to impaired bone healing and infection, systemic factors to host susceptibility and genetic predispositions, and procedural factors to surgical trauma and inadequate primary stability.
conclusionsEarly implant failure results from complex interactions among biological, mechanical, and host-related factors. An aetiology-based framework may improve understanding and prevention. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinical relevance: Identifying the multifactorial aetiology of early implant failure may help clinicians optimize primary stability, minimize micromovements during healing, and improve wound closure and infection control strategies in order to reduce the risk of early implant loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42414757What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.