ArticleHuman cell2026
A Cellosaurus-based systematic survey of sarcoma cell lines identifies critical gaps in public availability and priorities for future cell line development.
Article in Human cell, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sarcomas are rare mesenchymal malignancies with marked histological and molecular heterogeneity. Robust preclinical models are essential for therapeutic development, and tumor-derived cell lines remain widely used, because they are experimentally tractable and scalable. In sarcomas, the cell lines are scarce and often discontinued for distribution even after being registered in the public cell banks. Because generating and maintaining cell lines are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly, evidence-based prioritization of subtypes for cell line development is needed to promote sarcoma research. Here, we performed a systematic survey of sarcoma cell lines using Cellosaurus (version 54, November 2025), integrating publication status, registration in public cell banks, and current availability for distribution. From 167,127 Cellosaurus entries, we defined 87,573 unique human cell lines after excluding non-human entries and derivative or modified sublines. We identified 1080 human sarcoma cell lines, representing 1.2% of unique human cell lines. Only 230 human sarcoma cell lines were registered in public cell banks, and 139 were currently available for distribution. Most sarcoma subtypes had fewer than 10 available cell lines, and 12 sarcoma subtypes had no established cell lines. This updated landscape quantifies subtype-specific cell line scarcity and gaps in public availability and supports strategic prioritization of future sarcoma cell line development. Our findings also highlight practical measures to support long-term accessibility, including timely publication with standardized authentication reporting and guaranteeing repository redundancy via deposition in multiple public cell banks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42414741What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.