ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Deep Learning-Assisted Three-Dimensional Segmentation of Vertebrobasilar Artery Calcification in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
VBAC assessment is crucial for stroke risk evaluation, but manual segmentation is time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability. We developed a novel deep learning model specifically optimized for small vascular structure detection. We designed ImprovedVertebroV5, a 3D U-Net architecture incorporating focal attention mechanisms, small-object detection modules, and pyramid pooling for context aggregation. The model was trained and evaluated on a clinical dataset of CBCT scans from patients undergoing vertebrobasilar evaluation. The V5 model achieved a mean Dice score of 0.7312 ± 0.2080 and an IoU value of 0.6100 ± 0.2180 across 20 test patients. Precision was 0.7785 ± 0.1347, recall was 0.7457 ± 0.2526, specificity was 0.9997 ± 0.0003, and small-object sensitivity was 0.9417 ± 0.1816. Compared with the V4 benchmark, V5 showed statistically significant improvements in Dice score, IoU, recall, F1 score, and specificity. The proposed small object-optimized architecture demonstrated promising internal validation performance for automated VBAC segmentation on CBCT images and may support the future development of opportunistic screening tools in dental imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42414719What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.