ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
SparseMed3D: Foundation Models for Sparse Instance Medical Segmentation.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vision foundation models excel at general segmentation but underperform sharply when positive instances occupy a vanishing fraction of the input-a regime that arises across small-lesion and rare-event medical segmentation, with neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) as a representative extreme case (lesions <1% of brain volume; positive-to-negative voxel ratio >99:1). We present SparseMed3D, a framework for adapting vision foundation models to this extreme-sparsity regime through three coupled components: (i) parameter-efficient multi-channel patch-embedding adaptation; (ii) diffusion-based multi-channel image fusion with a provable descent property; and (iii) patch-based inference with variance bounds and concentration inequalities under arbitrarily correlated patch predictions. The unified theoretical analysis characterizes aggregation variance through an effective sample size that quantifies the correlation penalty between overlapping patches, and yields an end-to-end error bound that couples fusion and aggregation errors. We instantiate the framework on the BONBID-HIE 2023 benchmark, where the empirical aggregation variance closely matches the theoretical scaling across stride configurations (std 0.024 vs. 0.233), and the resulting model doubles baseline SAM-Med3D Dice (0.24
Indexed as
Identifiers
42414713What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.