Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42414712›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Domain-Specific Transfer Learning for Gastric Cancer Tissue Classification.

Venkata Ramana Kaneti, Santosh Reddy P, Alpha Vijayan, Balamuralikrishna Potti, Channabasava Ugranada, Subbarayudu Yerragudipadu, Ramesh Vatambeti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Venkata Ramana KanetiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, VNR Vignana Jyothi Institute of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500090, India.
Santosh Reddy PDepartment of Computer Science & Technology, Dayananda Sagar University, Bangalore, India.
Alpha VijayanDepartment of AI and Data Science Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, Christ University, Kengeri Campus, Bengaluru, India.
Balamuralikrishna PottiDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Chalapathi Institute of Technology, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Channabasava UgranadaDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Global Academy of Technology, Bangalore, 560098, India.
Subbarayudu YerragudipaduDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Hyderabad, 500043, India.
Ramesh VatambetiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Tezpur University, Tezpur, Assam, 784028, India. v2ramesh634@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2611-4925

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer is the fifth most diagnosed cancer worldwide and is the fifth most deadly. An essential part of the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer is the histopathological tissue classification. Pathologists classify tissue samples, but this is labour-intensive and can produce inconsistent results. In this study, we analyse the performance of CTransPath, a Swin Transformer model, for eight-class tissue classification after being pretrained on 15 million histopathological images, using the HMU-GC-HE-30K dataset, which contains 31,096 samples of gastric tissues. In a tenfold stratified cross-validation, we use a two-stage transfer learning model with a custom combination of histopathology-related data augmentation, class-weighted loss, and cosine annealing. The model reaches a macro AUC of 96.82% (±0.23%) (bootstrap 95% CI 96.70-96.91%) with patch-level accuracy of 76.74% (95% CI 76.27-77.20%) and macro F1 of 76.73% (95% CI 76.27-77.17%), indicating strong patch-level discriminative ability across the eight tissue classes in this internal single-institution evaluation. A dedicated calibration analysis (Brier score 0.325, expected calibration error 0.027 at 15 bins, calibration slope 1.14) shows that the predicted probabilities are reasonably well calibrated, with a mild tendency towards over-confidence. Additionally, a 4-variant ablation study shows that unfreezing the backbones provides a 3.4 to 3.6 percentage-point improvement over fixed-backbone models. Compared to multiple data models and architectures including the recently published pathology models UNI (ViT-L, 100M+ patches) and Virchow2 (ViT-H, 3.1M slides), CTransPath has the least parameters and provides the best performance within this controlled internal patch-level comparison. Under the same threefold protocol, CTransPath retained a statistically significant patch-level accuracy advantage over ImageNet-pretrained Swin-T and ResNet-50 (paired bootstrap

Indexed as

Ablation studyDeep learningExplainable artificial intelligenceFoundation modelsGastric cancerGrad-CAMHistopathologySHAPTissue classificationTransfer learningVision transformer

Identifiers

PMID42414712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.