ReviewJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Two-Dimensional Breast Ultrasound Radiomics: Implications for Lesion Characterization and Diagnostic Accuracy.
Review in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hippocampal Radiomic Signatures in Multiple Sclerosis Subtypes: A Machine Learning-Based MRI Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiomics applied to two-dimensional breast ultrasound has emerged as a potential noninvasive approach for differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions; however, its diagnostic accuracy and methodological reliability remain uncertain. This PRISMA-DTA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD420251149769) synthesized evidence from observational studies published between 2019 and 2026. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library identified 27 eligible studies. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and hierarchical summary ROC (HSROC) area under the curve were estimated using bivariate random-effects models; heterogeneity, threshold effects, and small-study effects were assessed with I
Indexed as
Identifiers
42414707What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.