ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Radiologic and clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) is a major cause of thoracic myelopathy requiring surgical decompression. While unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) has been increasingly applied to thoracic decompression, quantitative radiologic evidence regarding decompression adequacy and posterior structure preservation remains limited.
methodsThis retrospective single-center study included consecutive patients who underwent thoracic UBE decompression for OLF. Radiologic outcomes were assessed at the segment level using magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA), facet joint length and area, and segmental kyphosis were quantitatively measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, Nurick grade, and visual analog scale (VAS). Postoperative residual OLF and complications were recorded.
resultsA total of 45 patients (55 segments) were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 16.0 months. Mean DSCA increased significantly from 70.4 ± 20.4 mm² preoperatively to 119.8 ± 31.0 mm² postoperatively, corresponding to a mean expansion ratio of 75.0%. Facet preservation was asymmetric, with significantly greater preservation on the contralateral side compared with the ipsilateral approach side (facet area preservation: 79.4% vs. 64.2%, p < 0.001). Segmental kyphosis increased modestly at 1-year follow-up (mean change, 1.5°), while clinically significant kyphotic progression requiring surgical stabilization was rare. Clinical outcomes improved significantly, with a mean mJOA recovery rate of 71.2%. Residual OLF was observed in a subset of segments and primarily reflected an intentional floating strategy rather than incomplete decompression.
conclusionsThoracic UBE decompression for OLF achieves substantial dural sac expansion and favorable clinical outcomes while preserving posterior stabilizing structures. In this retrospective single-arm cohort, adequate decompression was accomplished without routine fusion or extensive posterior element disruption. Thoracic UBE may be a feasible, tissue-preserving option in carefully selected patients with thoracic OLF, although comparative studies are needed to define its role relative to conventional surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42414664What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.