Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42414663›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

A predictive tool incorporating frailty scores for perioperative risk assessment in patients with spinal metastasis: a national retrospective cohort study.

Abdul Karim Ghaith, Xinlan Yang, Yazan Alasadi, William ElNemer, Mohamad Ghaith, Zhehao Zhang, Pritika Papali, Anthony Davidson, Nicholas Theodore, Daniel Lubelski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abdul Karim GhaithJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States. abdulkarimghaith@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9600-609X
Xinlan YangJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.
Yazan AlasadiIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NYC, New York, United States.
William ElNemerJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.
Mohamad GhaithJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.
Zhehao ZhangJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.
Pritika PapaliJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.
Anthony DavidsonJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.
Nicholas TheodoreJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.
Daniel LubelskiJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical treatment for spinal metastases is associated with high perioperative risk due to tumor burden, neurologic compromise, and limited physiological reserve. Frailty is a recognized predictor of adverse outcomes, yet most existing indices exclude key clinical variables. This study evaluated and enhanced the predictive performance of three frailty instruments-the 5-item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5), 11-item mFI (mFI-11), and Risk Analysis Index-Administrative (RAI-A)-by incorporating five clinically relevant covariates: serum albumin, hematocrit, body mass index (BMI), spinal region, and procedure type.

methodsA retrospective cohort analysis was performed using the ACS-NSQIP database (2010-2022) to identify adult patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastases. Frailty scores and clinical covariates were analyzed using logistic regression and ensemble machine learning models. Primary outcomes were 30-day postoperative complications, readmission, and reoperation. Model performance was assessed using discrimination and reclassification metrics.

resultsA total of 5,052 patients were included. Higher frailty scores were significantly associated with increased complication rates, prolonged hospitalization, higher early mortality, and lower rates of discharge to home (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, vertebrectomy/corpectomy, thoracic or multilevel surgery, and lower preoperative hematocrit were independently associated with increased complication risk. Higher serum albumin was protective against early reoperation, while steroid use and delayed time to surgery predicted higher readmission risk. The RAI-A model performed best for complications, while the mFI-5 model showed strongest association with reoperation. Augmenting frailty indices with the five clinical covariates improved predictive performance across all outcomes.

conclusionFrailty is a clinically meaningful predictor of perioperative risk in spinal metastasis surgery. Integrating serum albumin, hematocrit, BMI, spinal region, and procedure type with frailty indices enhances risk stratification and informs surgical planning, preoperative optimization, and patient counseling in this vulnerable population. Our web-based risk calculator can aid in risk prediction while maximizing utility and simplicity: https://huggingface.co/spaces/Lansaol/Frailty_in_Spine_Met .

Indexed as

ACS-NSQIPFrailtyModified frailty indexPerioperative risk assessmentRisk analysis indexRisk prediction modelSpinal metastasisSpine surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.