Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42414643›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Comparative Evaluation of Argon and Helium Plasma for Controlled Epidermal Peeling and Dermal Remodeling in Human Skin Tissue.

Zhiyuan Ding, Caijun Jin, Yongxun Jin, Yong-Hyun Lee, Gun Young Ahn, Boncheol Leo Goo, Kyoung Su Jung, Hyun Soo Hwang, Pham Ngoc Chien, Chan-Yeong Heo

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhiyuan Ding *Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Caijun Jin *Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yongxun JinDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yong-Hyun LeeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Gun Young AhnGowoonsesang Dermatology Clinic, Seoul, 06055, Republic of Korea.
Boncheol Leo GooNaeum Dermatology and Aesthetics Clinic, Seoul, 04512, Republic of Korea.
Kyoung Su JungAgnes Medical Co., Ltd., Seongnam, 13591, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Soo HwangAgnes Medical Co., Ltd., Seongnam, 13591, Republic of Korea.
Pham Ngoc ChienDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea. ngocchien1781@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1419-3766
Chan-Yeong HeoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. lionheo@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlasma-based devices are increasingly used for skin rejuvenation and epidermal peeling; however, standardized parameters for different plasma gases remain insufficient. Argon (Ar) and helium (He) plasma exhibit distinct physical and biological characteristics, necessitating systematic evaluation to define safe and reproducible treatment conditions.

methodsAn ex vivo human skin explant model was used to evaluate Ar and He plasma generated by the Plasma Magic device under standardized pulse conditions (1 Hz, 500 ms, 2 pulses). Multiple output levels were assessed to identify parameters achieving complete epidermal peeling without dermal injury. Histological analyses and quantitative RT-PCR of extracellular matrix (ECM)-related genes were performed up to 14 days post-treatment. The effects of adjunctive Lactovesicle application were also evaluated.

resultsAr plasma at level 6 and He plasma at level 8 consistently induced uniform epidermal detachment while preserving dermal architecture and maintaining stable inflammatory cell counts. Collagen and elastin synthesis significantly increased between days 7 and 14, accompanied by marked upregulation of ECM-related genes. He plasma showed stronger long-term elastin synthesis and gene induction, whereas Ar plasma promoted faster initial peeling and early collagen remodeling. Lactovesicle application further enhanced ECM regeneration.

conclusionsOptimized Ar and He plasma parameters enable controlled epidermal peeling and sustained dermal remodeling without tissue damage. Plasma-assisted treatment, particularly when combined with topical Lactovesicle, represents a promising strategy for skin rejuvenation and transdermal therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

ArgonEpidermisHeliumPlasma GasesSkin AgingCollagenHumansMaleRejuvenationArgonCollagenHeliumPlasma GasesArgon plasmaCollagen remodelingHelium plasmaPlasma magicSkin explant model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.