ArticleCommunications chemistry2026
msBayesImpute as a versatile framework for addressing missing values in biomedical mass spectrometry proteomics data.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancements in mass spectrometry (MS) technologies have significantly improved the ability to quantify proteins and analyse their modifications. However, MS-based proteomics datasets frequently encounter missing values due to a complex interplay of missing at random (MAR) and missing not at random (MNAR) mechanisms. Such missing data can result in information loss and biased outcomes in data pre-processing, as well as subsequent analyses and interpretations. Few approaches effectively address both MAR and MNAR, and those that do often necessitate manual tuning of mixture percentages between them or rely on two-group experimental designs. Therefore, we developed msBayesImpute, an innovative computational method that integrates Bayesian factorization with probabilistic dropout models. We evaluated msBayesImpute against several popular imputation methods using both simulated missing values and those generated through a dilution series experiment on samples from lung cancer patients. Our comprehensive benchmark demonstrated superior performance in reconstructing missing values, estimating normalization factors, identifying differentially expressed proteins and predicting outcomes with machine learning models across varying levels of missingness and sample sizes. Notably, msBayesImpute does not require predefined experimental designs and is scalable to large-scale studies. This versatility positions msBayesImpute as an effective and robust tool for enhancing the utility of MS datasets in biological research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.