ArticleScientific reports2026
The PROTECT databank a population based linked administrative resource on child maltreatment and intellectual disability with early findings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children with intellectual disability (ID) experience disproportionate social and health adversities; however, population-level evidence integrating child protection and healthcare data remains scarce. We introduce the Child Development and Protection Pathways in Intellectual Disability (PROTECT) databank a province-wide linked administrative infrastructure in Québec, Canada, and report initial findings from a population-based retrospective longitudinal cohort study (N = 18,095). Using linked child protection records, physician billing claims, and hospitalization data, we identified children born between 2001 and 2016 and residing in six administrative regions. ID was defined using outpatient and inpatient diagnostic codes, and maltreatment was defined as at least one child protection report retained for evaluation before age 18. Children were classified into four mutually exclusive cohorts based on the presence or absence of ID and child maltreatment. We estimated the prevalence and cumulative burden of mental and physical health service use and compared cohorts using negative binomial regression models. Children with co-occurring ID and maltreatment experienced the highest cumulative burden of service use, whereas those with neither exposure had the lowest. Across outcomes, the presence of ID was the primary correlate of elevated burden, with the highest mental health burden among children with dual exposure. PROTECT establishes a scalable population-level resource to examine intersecting developmental and protection-related risks and provides actionable evidence to inform strategies aimed at reducing health inequities among children with developmental vulnerabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.